• Replies 13 replies
  • Subscribers 2 subscribers
  • Views 3 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Related

Do you let technicians self-schedule, or is everything dispatcher-controlled?

Deja Washington

Hi everyone! Hope you're all having a great week so far!

So our team has been growing (we're up to 14 techs now!) and I'm wondering if we should start letting our senior technicians do some of their own scheduling. Right now I control everything from the dispatch board — who's going where, what order, the whole thing. It's worked fine but honestly it's getting to be a lot, especially when I'm out sick or on vacation and someone else has to cover.

I've heard some teams let techs claim open jobs or move things around within their own routes, and I'm curious how that works in practice. Does it actually save time or does it just create chaos? What about when customers request specific techs — do you let the tech handle that directly?

Really appreciate any insights! We're trying to figure out what "good" looks like as we scale up. Thanks so much in advance!

Parents

  • We've been doing a hybrid model for about two years now and I would never go back to full dispatcher control.

    Here's what works for us:

    • Dispatchers own the "bucket" — what jobs need to happen today, in what general geographic zone
    • Techs own the sequence — they can reorder their route based on traffic, part availability, or customer preferences they've built relationships with

    The key is guardrails, not gates. We set rules: no moving jobs to tomorrow without dispatcher approval, no skipping high-priority calls, no swapping with another tech without checking availability. But within those lines? Let them run.

    Pro tip: this only works if your techs actually care about efficiency. If you've got a crew that will milk the clock, keep the reins tight. But for self-motivated teams, you're removing a bottleneck and building ownership.

Reply

  • We've been doing a hybrid model for about two years now and I would never go back to full dispatcher control.

    Here's what works for us:

    • Dispatchers own the "bucket" — what jobs need to happen today, in what general geographic zone
    • Techs own the sequence — they can reorder their route based on traffic, part availability, or customer preferences they've built relationships with

    The key is guardrails, not gates. We set rules: no moving jobs to tomorrow without dispatcher approval, no skipping high-priority calls, no swapping with another tech without checking availability. But within those lines? Let them run.

    Pro tip: this only works if your techs actually care about efficiency. If you've got a crew that will milk the clock, keep the reins tight. But for self-motivated teams, you're removing a bottleneck and building ownership.

Children