Is anyone using FieldPulse's photo/documentation requirements effectively?

We've been experimenting with making photos mandatory on certain job types, and I'm trying to figure out if we're actually getting better documentation or just creating busywork.

Pro tip: Start with your highest-liability jobs first. For us, that's anything involving water lines or electrical panel work. We set up required photo checkpoints—before, during, after—and it's definitely caught a couple "oh crap" moments before they became customer complaints.

But here's the friction: some of my younger guys are great with it, document everything without being asked. The veterans? Not so much. One of my best techs, 20 years in the field, treats his phone like it's radioactive. He'll take the photos, but they're... not useful. Blurry shots of the general vicinity. Technically compliant, actually worthless.

So I'm curious—how are you actually using photo requirements? Are you seeing quality improvements, or just checkbox compliance? And has anyone found a way to make this feel less like micromanagement to experienced techs who already know what they're doing?

Parents
  • We want to make sure you're set up for success with this rollout! I'd love to hear what specific job types you're planning to require photos on, and whether you've thought through how you'll review them.

    One thing we've seen work well: start with a pilot group of 3-5 techs, get their feedback on the friction points, then adjust before going company-wide. The engineers who built this feature are always looking for real-world input on what makes documentation actually useful vs. just compliant.

    Happy to connect you directly if you'd like to share your use case!

  • We need this working by Q4. Pilot sounds nice but we don't have time.

    Current system: photos required on jobs over $2K, warranty work, and any callback. Dispatch reviews same-day, flags anything incomplete. My team can't move forward with the new compliance audit until this is standardized.

Reply Children
No Data