• Replies 12 replies
  • Subscribers 2 subscribers
  • Views 2 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Related

Who's integrated FieldPulse with their CRM? How's it going?

Brianna Simmons

Hi everyone! I'm Brianna, a service coordinator at a mid-sized HVAC company, and we're trying to figure out if integrating FieldPulse with our CRM is worth the effort. Right now we're using HubSpot for our sales team and FieldPulse for dispatch/field ops, and the two systems are basically completely separate. Sales creates a deal in HubSpot, then once it's closed they email us the details and we manually create the work order in FieldPulse. It's... not great! Lots of back-and-forth, information gets lost, customers get frustrated when sales tells them one thing and field techs show up expecting something else.

I've been looking at the Salesforce integration thread but that seems pretty technical and we're on HubSpot, so I'm not sure how much applies. I've also seen some mentions of Zapier as a middleman option?

So I'm curious — for those of you who have actually done this integration (Salesforce, HubSpot, or whatever), how did it go? Was it worth the setup time? What actually syncs, and what doesn't? Did you run into issues with data conflicts or duplicate records? And probably most importantly — did it actually make your teams' lives easier, or did it just create new problems?

Any real-world experiences would be so appreciated! We're trying to decide if we should tackle this in Q3 or push it to next year. Thanks so much!!!

Parents

  • Hey Brianna — we did the HubSpot integration about 6 months ago. YMMV but here's what worked for us:

    • What syncs: Contacts, companies, and deals → customers and work orders in FieldPulse. We set it up so that when a deal hits "Closed Won" in HubSpot, it auto-creates the work order.
    • Heads up: Custom fields don't map cleanly. We had to do some Zapier gymnastics to get our "Job Type" field from HubSpot into FieldPulse.
    • The gotcha: Bidirectional sync is limited. Changes in FieldPulse don't flow back to HubSpot automatically, so our sales team still has to manually update deal status when jobs complete. Worth noting if your sales team lives in HubSpot.

    Overall? Took about 2 weeks to get right, but saved us probably 5-10 hours a week of manual data entry. Happy to share more details if helpful.

Reply

  • Hey Brianna — we did the HubSpot integration about 6 months ago. YMMV but here's what worked for us:

    • What syncs: Contacts, companies, and deals → customers and work orders in FieldPulse. We set it up so that when a deal hits "Closed Won" in HubSpot, it auto-creates the work order.
    • Heads up: Custom fields don't map cleanly. We had to do some Zapier gymnastics to get our "Job Type" field from HubSpot into FieldPulse.
    • The gotcha: Bidirectional sync is limited. Changes in FieldPulse don't flow back to HubSpot automatically, so our sales team still has to manually update deal status when jobs complete. Worth noting if your sales team lives in HubSpot.

    Overall? Took about 2 weeks to get right, but saved us probably 5-10 hours a week of manual data entry. Happy to share more details if helpful.

Children
  • in reply to Devon Marsh

    Thanks so much Devon!!! This is exactly the kind of detail I needed. The custom fields thing is definitely a concern for us — we have a lot of specific job type codes that need to carry over. When you say "Zapier gymnastics," did you end up building a multi-step zap or was there a simpler workaround? Also curious if you've looked at the newer native integration at all — HubSpot was supposedly on their roadmap last I checked.

  • in reply to Brianna Simmons

    Multi-step zap — HubSpot deal updated → filter for Closed Won → format job type via lookup table → create FieldPulse work order. The lookup table was the key, otherwise we were getting inconsistent values.

    Haven't tried the native integration yet, though I saw the partnership announcement. Might be worth waiting if you're not in a rush. The Zapier approach is stable but definitely feels like a bridge solution.